A 'Close Reading' of HB-1035 -- Why I Support It!

Close reading...we hear a lot about that in the Common Core Standards written by David Coleman. We've seen examples of his interpretation of the strategy. If this is, indeed, something we value in education, teachers should practice close reading in their own professional life. As always, we teach better when we have had experience in the work.

There is no better opportunity to practice close reading -- re-reading passages, analyzing on the word and phrase level, reflecting on meaning, the development of ideas -- than to read a legislative bill. I confess I'm a novice, having only spent the last few years really digging into the rules of reading a bill. But I appreciate going to the source and finding my own interpretation instead of relying on someone else's reading.

When I shot off my letter about standardized, high-stakes testing, I received a speedy reply from Dennis Casey, Vice Chair of the House Education Committee, a Republican. He suggested I look at his bill on testing, and gave me his cell phone number to call so we could visit. I was, frankly, stunned by this open response, having spent the past few years soundly ignored by every policymaker in the state.

In our subsequent conversation, I was stunned to learn his own party leadership is actively opposing this bill. HB-1035 has three major opponents: Superintendent Barresi, Governor Fallin, and the Daily Oklahoman. Enough for me to love it even before I read!  It enjoys strong support from both houses: 94-7 in support in the House, and 42-3 in the Senate. That kind of bipartisan support is rare in our state on education issues.

Representative Casey described the mean-spirited editorial that denigrated his experiences as an educator and Coach of the Year as evidence of his lowering standards ( Have spent 30 minutes searching online for the editorial, and I can't find it. Any help you can give me is appreciated!). As an educator, I was offended...not for the first time.

Let's never forget one of the editorial writers at the DOK is married to Dr. Barresi's former Chief-of-Staff. I'm sure they still visit.

So, my lesson on close reading. Check to see who the authors are, and if there seems to be bi-partisan support. There are two forms of the bill, and the "Engrossed Senate Amendment to Engrossed House" has co-authors from both parties: Casey and Ed Cannaday, a Democrat and former educator, as is Casey, have both signed on. So did Senator Ford, Republican Chair of the Education Committee.

I'll be honest and tell you I do not understand the technical language sometimes, and if I were truly close-reading, I would stop my reading to define every word. And since they're legislative terms, I'd be wrong since I wouldn't have the right reference materials.

On to my reading...I've learned if print has been crossed out, those are changes that will be thrown out of the new legislation. If sections are underlined, those are the new provisions...the new action to be taken.

Most of the bill seems to be the original high-stakes legislation, setting up Criterion Reference Testing (CRT) for elementary and middle school students, and End of Instruction, EOI testing for high school students. No underlining, no striking out of language.

The additions, though, are fascinating, and they're the reason I support This legislation that passed with overwhelming votes.

Changes to the original bill begin on page 12.

Right now high school students must pass English 2 (with a writing and objective component), Algebra 1, and take Algebra 2, Geometry, English 3 (also two components-- writing and objective), US History, and Biology 1. They must pass two additional tests in order to graduate. At a conservative two-hour estimate per test (two tests for English 2 and 3),  that's nearly 20 hours of standardized, high-stakes testing during students' career.

Diplomas are now withheld to students who passed all their classes, earned all their credits to graduation, have been accepted into an institution of higher education, but have not passed the required four tests. The State Board did just that last summer, and it will happen again this year.

Under SB-1035, students will have multiple pathways -- none of them easy, none of them a 'gimme' -- to showing test (I will not say 'objective') proficiency in these subjects. If a student does not pass the EOI, he or she may take the ACT, the SAT, a CLEP test and score one point higher than proficient, and use this evidence to 'pass'. Advanced Placement testing can also be used, as can International Baccalaureate exams. All of these tests are challenging, nationally-accepted exams. I believe they also carry considerable financial costs. the devil's in the details, but I see this as a positive step toward graduation for all our students.

I LOVE this statement: "The State Board of Education shall not limit the ability of a student to demonstrate mastery of academic content to any one approved alternate exam." In other words, this legislation gives kids options to show mastery, and the SDE can't veto their attempts.

The other provision my students and I heartily support is the language that will exempt students from taking additional EOIs once they've passed their four. English 2, Algebra 1 are required, and must be passed, and curiously, Biology 1 is a required test...but once they've passed four, they may opt out of any other testing. I overheard a senior telling about being pulled out of class to take an EOI that is completely meaningless to her, since she'd already passed her four. I've watched students completely blow off that seventh test, out of frustration and anger at a system that requires them to take tests that no university accepts as evidence of competence, that have absolutely no importance to them. But there is language that will allow students to choose to take more tests. And I know some kids who would do that if given the choice. Most would opt to stay in class and learn.

Education 'reformers', including our state leadership, strongly support multiple pathways to teacher certification. A teacher who moved to Oklahoma with current, out-of-state certification must take the same tests (enriching Pearson in the process) as the Frito-Lay driver looking for a career change in the waiting room with her. Take a test and you're a teacher.

Why should we afford multiple-pathways to teacher certification, and deny the same consideration, the same respect, to our students?

I also understand this is not a perfect analogy...alternative certification rests firmly on ONE standardized, high -stakes test. HB-1035 expands that to several other difficult assessments.

This bill does NOT dumb-down graduation requirements; it does NOT lower standards. Does the DOK editorial writer truly believe our state EOIs are harder to pass than the ACT, or an AP exam? From letters in response, it sounds like the editorial writer cherry-picked his or her data.

This bill does respect our students as learners and says clearly, 'we're here to help you succeed and we have some options for you to pursue.'

NOW, what I'd rather have is a bill that does away with all these tests, but that ain't gonna happen in this political climate. We'll have to watch more testing debacles like last week, more kids fail, more horror stories. Then, maybe we'll get the bill I really want.

In the meantime, HB-1035, after a close reading, is, I believe, the best option we have to date. Please contact Governor Fallin and tell her you want her to sign this when it crosses her desk.

Representative Casey and I have continued to talk, and he told me this: "I agree that many items need to be address.  I was hoping to address that students who scored well on explore, plan, ACT, etc did not need to again show mastery on another battery of test.  This could motivate student to do well.  It would also allow less testing and put a focus on students who need it most." 

And: "I also have no doubt in my mind that some students after passing the first 4 do not always put their best effort in the remaining 3 EOI.  I sure would hate that my evaluation would weigh to heavily on a child who did not try on a test.I look forward to the interim where the Senate and House will do a study in order to take a good look at the procedure now in place."

We need to keep reaching out to our legislators; we may find others who are willing to talk and have an honest dialogue.

QUIET by Susan Cain -- a Book for Us All

Fascinating! Susan Cain's Quiet is a book that we all should read. Some of us will nod in recognition. Others will gain an important insight into the hearts of those we love

All these years I've thought I am an ex-introvert. Come to find out, I've just learned to pretend to be extroverted in situations that really matter to me. When I feel passionately about what I'm doing, I'll willingly step out of my comfort zone and act like an extrovert. But, afterwards, I hurry back home to sit in my chair, with a book...that is where I recharge for the next foray into the loud world.

Makes sense. Makes a lot of sense.

I appreciated the balance of narrative and research. Cain hit the right chord time and again. The stories connected me, and then the discussion of the research behind the stories solidified it.

Our world, especially European, especially American, has as a foundation the belief that extroverts are superior, better able to make decisions, more sure of themselves, even perhaps smarter....and we have gone down some unfortunate paths believing that...Cain shows how Group Think, that led us into the latest financial disaster, is not the best way to make decisions. Only the loud people participate, and quieter members, IF they speak at all, are likely marginalized. And then, there's that overweening confidence that some extroverts display in competitive situations -- that drives prices up, and makes ventures more risky.

As much as I enjoyed those discussions, I perked up the most when she talked about schools and children and teachers. Again, most schools, with their crowded classrooms, emphasis on group work and free-wheeling class discussions, favor extroverts. I was that kid who, during discussions, would NEVER speak up, but I knew who was right and who was wrong. When this is the default classroom style, we ignore the needs and gifts of up to a third of our students. I know...I was one of them.

As I look through Cain's lens, I realize I have been drawn to reading because of my active internal life...I don't feel lonely reading; I feel energized. I plan my class for Quiets...I apologize to my kids who want more interaction, less predictability, more moving around. I do build in some interaction for that reason. But mine is a class that is designed to find that quiet, and to become comfortable there. Some of my more extroverted students squirm from the first to the last day, but they try. And they read great books. My quiet students find comfort. They often tell me how peaceful they feel in my class. I'm glad to know now I'm doing a service for all students in providing this space quite unlike other high school classes.

Cain gives teachers and parents advice on how to nurture and encourage quiet kids. She tells horror stories about extroverted parents who tried to 'fix' their introverted children instead of celebrating them. We all need to read this, no matter what our style.

When I shared this in class, many of my quiet students perked up and were very interested...They need to know they don't have to change to 'fit into' an extroverted world. They need to find their passion which will inspire them to be assertive and honor their need for...quiet

High Stakes Testing Must Go

My letter to the Education Committees and Superintendent Barresi, who is outraged...just outraged. So are we.

It's not Pearson; it's not McGraw Hill. It's the high-stakes testing culture. It's not our kids; it's not our teachers. It's the culture -- and I hold you responsible for the culture of high-states testing.

We have been putting more and more emphasis on standardized tests, stretching their purpose out of recognition. Standardized tests are designed to be a snapshot in time -- one piece of assessment information about our students. That's all. But now third graders will soon be flunked on the basis of tests, teachers will be evaluated, schools graded. Already we are denying high school diplomas...all on tests that were not designed for these purposes.

To believe that standardized tests are objective is to believe in the Tooth Fairy. Human judgement frames the questions, chooses the distractors, writes the 'correct' answer. Human judgement chooses the passages and the prompts. Human judgement then scores open-ended questions and sets 'cut' scores. There is nothing remotely objective about standardized tests. 

To believe that spending millions of the state's money in contracts with out-of-state testing companies, no matter who they are, is a wise use of limited funds is naive and mistaken. With tax cuts being pushed by our leaders, there will be less and less money for schools...but can I expect the testing budget to be cut?

To believe we can cynically throw the blame and our outrage on these companies denies our culpability. Who contracted with these companies? Who passed the laws to abuse standardized tests for their own purposes? Who worships at the foot of the almighty test? Before you blame the corporations who can't deliver on your test-culture mission, look in the mirror.

Then, come to a school where students sat at their computers, ready to take tests. Apprehensive, yes, but confident and ready. Come to a school and watch the computers lock and freeze. Watch kids sit, as some did, for hours, waiting for their screens to come back. Come and tell these kids they won't graduate because of the test score...tell them they'll spend another year in third grade.

Outraged? Yes I am; but my outrage is focused on policymakers who cynically colluded with for-profit corporations to twist and subvert the purpose of assessment, to funnel millions of dollars out of our state, to force accountability on everyone but themselves. 

Continuing to abuse the purpose of standardized tests will bring more outrage -- outrage you can't deflect. 

Let's start some accountability at the top. 

What will you answer to children and their parents and teachers who are living this nightmare of your making?

Hoping for an uneventful day of more testing tomorrow...

What are We Reading Today?

I recently read a blog posting by Gary Anderson, "What Students Read When They Can Read Anything" and I eagerly read through the list to find new titles. That's what readers do -- look for that next book, and the one after that.

I knew I wanted to have my students list their current books, and a perfect opportunity arose when my friend and fellow Oklahoma Writing Project Teacher Consultant, Jason Stephenson, visited our class last week. I wanted Jason to have a souvenir of our visit, and I wanted my students to feel likethey were contributing to his visit.

So, we started a "Today I'm Reading" list first hour, and students contributed to it all day. I know we didn't catch everyone, but this is a very typical representation of what happens in my classroom.

My students have complete free choice with their books. They can choose to read above or below grade level (whatever that means). They can reread favorites, they can read books they've been assigned in other classes. They can read fiction or nonfiction. Memoir, science-fiction, romance, young adult literature. The only catch is, they must read books. Magazines will not build the stamina needed in college, or on all those tests kids are subjected to. Books...with lots of opportunity to build comprehension, make adjustments, activate prior learning. Books.

Then we turn on the music, we get comfortable, and we read.

When I talk to skeptics about my class one question always comes up. Sadly, it reflects a lack of respect for students and their abilities as readers: "Well, if you let them read whatever they want, won't they read trash?" Meaning "Won't they avoid any challenge? Won't they pretend to read like they've pretended for their entire school career? How can we trust high school students to read well if we let them choose?"

Well -- here's what my students were reading on Thursday, April 25. 2013:

1st Hour Eclipse The Inferno American Psycho The Time Traveler’s Wife The Perks of Being a Wallflower The Lovely Bones The Dark Between The Glass Castle Fellowship of the Rings Looking for Alaska Playing for Pizza Crazy Love Life as We Knew it Water for Elephants Clockwork Angel Deadline Mockingjay The Storyteller One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest Renegade Beneath the Lion’s Gaze Thirteen Reasons Why Keeping Faith Deathless The Crazy Horse Electric Game Pet Sematary 2nd Hour A Monster Calls

Stardust

A Thousand Splendid Suns

Shattering Glass

Everwild

The Great Gatsby

Beautiful Chaos

Beauty Queens

Demian

Period.8

Maximum Ride

Everfound

Eat Pray Love

Seeing Redd

Unwind

Top Dog

Freaks Like Us

Impossible

1984

Shogun

Game

Mockingjay

I am the Messenger

Soul Screamers Vol. 2

World War Z

Inheritance

My Sister’s Keeper

4th Hour

The Guardian

The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King

The Other Wes Moore

Divergent

Split

The Rescue

Everlost

The Fault in Our Stars

Mockingjay

A Wizard of Earthsea

Beautiful Creatures

The Fellowship of the Ring

Fallen Angels

I Am Seal Team Six Warrior

The House of Tomorrow

Glass

The 19th Wife

Extras

The Rules of Survival

Food, Girls, and Other Things I Can’t Have

Compound

Everlost

Silver Linings Playbook

I Hunt Killers

The Pledge

Midnighters

5th Hour

I am the Messenger

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

The Fault in Our Stars

Crossed

American Sniper

True Grit

Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead

15 Months In SOG

The Confession

Tone

Twilight

Want to Go Private?

Impulse

Spider-man

Right Behind You

Rangers Apprentice Book 6 : Siege of Macindaw

Unwholly, I Hunt Killers

The Maze Runner

Something Borrowed

Norwegian Wood

Betrayed

Rapture

The Storyteller

The Golden Spiral

Romiette and Julio

SIXTH HOUR

Hate List

The Sirens of Titan

The Slayer Chronicles

Soul Surfer

Shattered Mirror

Something Like Normal

Chain Reaction

Blood on my Hands

World War Z

The Secret History

The Future of Us

How to Be a Hepburn in a Hilton World

The Great Gatsby

Split

A Walk in the Woods

Speaker for the Dead

Clockwork Princess

The Book Thief

The Seven Storey Mountain

Beautiful Ruins

Stranger in a Strange Land

Destined “House of Night Series”

The Five People You Meet in Heaven

I challenge even the biggest skeptic to find trash here...great YAL, popular fiction, nonfiction, classics...probably much better books than the majority of adults are currently reading. Because I know who is reading what, I could tell you stories about each book...about how book recommendations travel through a class, about how we are currently obsessed with Barry Lyga and Neil Shusterman at the moment. About my student in sixty hour who has several of us reading Murakami.

I'm proud of my students. Each book, each page, is a victory. From my intellectually-disabled student who is almost finished with the Hunger Games series, to the boy who's reading The Inferno -- for pleasure, every student is reading and growing and thinking. Every student has learned the power of the right book at the right time. 

I am in awe.

HB1880 -- Good News and Bad News for NBCTs -- and Future NBCTs

HB1880 changes the way new National Board Certified Teachers will be rewarded for attaining NBC. I am thrilled that we'll have our program back. The two-year moratorium has nearly crippled us. The image I use to describe what's happened is an old clinker that's been left to rust in the front yard, nearly covered by the tall grass...it's rusting from neglect, but it's still got the potential to be that sleek vehicle it was two years ago...this bill will give us the key to turn the ignition. But at a cost to new NBCTs. My letter to the bill's author, Ann Coody.

Representative Coody,

I’m sorry I missed you at the NBCT Reception Tuesday; I saw you across the room but got delayed before I could say ‘hello’.

Thank you for continuing to search for ways to support the National Board program, and Education Leadership Oklahoma, the agency that is our ‘home’ in all ways.

I appreciate the intent of HB1880, which you authored, but I have some concerns and questions. I hope you can clarify my confusions.

• ·         On page 8, you set out the conditions for current NBCTs – they will receive the $5000 bonus for ten years. Does this begin with the 2014 year? Will renewed NBCTs be eligible for the life of their renewed certificate? What about NBCTs who are ready to renew in the next few years? Will this bill allow them to combine the last years of their original certificate and years on their renewed certificate to equal ten years? That will make a huge difference in the decisions of thousands of NBCTs across the state.
• ·         I appreciate your designating January 31 as the deadline for payments of stipends. That’s in the current bill and has been violated for the last two years. NBCTs jumped hoops and still didn’t get their stipend payments in January…or February. Some didn’t receive their money until March. I’m trusting this will not be the case in the future.
• ·         But, my biggest concerns and most serious questions focus on the changes for new NBCTs once we get our program up and running again.
• ·         $1200 as a step raise equals around $850 after taxes. Or around $70 per month. This amount will hardly make a difference to a teacher who’s trying to stay in the classroom, which is the intent of this program.
• ·         In order to earn the $50,000 current NBCTs earn, an NBCT would have to work for 41.67 years…just to earn the same amount I earned in ten for the same certification.
• ·         On page 9, the language of the bill states new NBCTs will earn the step raise of $1200 if their ‘National Board Certification has not lapsed.’ National Board certification is only current for 10 years. After that, an NBCT must renew, at a cost of $1250. Does your bill require NBCTs to continue renewing their certification in order to receive the step? It certainly appears to be the case. With the small pay-off for NBC, will the state pay the renewal fee for NBCTs? Right now we pay this fee out of our own pocket, understanding the state has made a substantial investment in our teaching.
• ·         So, let’s return to that teacher trying to earn in step raises what current NBCTs earn: $50,000. That teacher, working 41.67 years, will be required to renew that certification four times, at a cost of $1250 for each renewal…forcing the NBCT to work four more years to make up the money lost in fees.
• ·         And my biggest concern: Who pays for these step raises? Will the state send districts enough money to cover all the new NBCTs’ step raise? Or, is this going to be an unfunded mandate to school districts? Will they be forced to find the money in their squeezed budgets? If so, NBCTs will be a liability for a district instead of an asset. Who will pay FICA, since the state has shorted districts for the past two years, and that money has come out of OUR checks?

You have sold this bill as a positive move for teachers since the step raise will count toward retirement. TRS only counts the three highest-earning years toward retirement. So, if a teacher’s NBC lapses because she chooses not to renew, her salary actually will decrease – if I read page 9 correctly. But as she continues to teach, her years of experience will quickly trump whatever bump the NBCT step gave her, making NBC less attractive.

Only three years of NBCT step raises will count toward retirement: $3600. I’ll be contacting TRS to ask how much of a benefit $3600 will be for a teacher. I fear I know the answer.

I see your changes to the system as a bad deal for teachers who are waiting to go through the NBCT process. This process was more rigorous and challenging than my master’s degree, and for some candidates, takes three years to complete…the last two years at their own expense.

If you’re trying to discourage teachers from going through this process, making the salary step equivalent to a master’s degree – and then taking it away if NBC expires –  will do just that.

I’m hoping we can talk through some of my concerns, because the best thing about your bill, the thing I love, is that we get our ELO program back! We can go out into the front yard and climb into that rusty car we’ve left neglected in the weeds. We can climb into the driver’s seat and turn on the ignition…and hope it starts to purr.

Having the ELO program back, running our Summer Institute, having support meetings again fills my heart with joy. Our program has suffered through this moratorium. My Region 11 Candidate Support meetings used to include 50-60 candidates and NBCTs, all working together to become better teachers, to reach our students. They were exciting, vibrant meeting with professional conversations about students and student learning. This year my meetings have dwindled to three or four, or sometimes six teachers.

We need our program back, and, and even with my concerns, I see your bill giving us back the keys to that rusty car. We know how to drive it, and we know we can make this work.

When we read, we learn. When we learn, we grow. National Board at work in my classroom.

"Consistently, one hour a day, forced to read (our choice for once), students get to read something of their choice in school. There are probably many kids who don't get that time at home. The fact that North provides that opportunity for all students -- it's absolutely awesome." -- R4P student, 2013

"When we sit down to read we are bound to love it more and more - it's a fundamental action of our being...we learn, if not traditionally, then we learn in a non-conventional sense, but we must learn...to read is to learn." -- R4P student, 2013

Both semesters this year I've asked students to chart their attitudes about reading three times during the term: first week, midterm, and finals week. We just past the half-way point of this last semester, so we charted and reflected again. I love reading what kids make of the data they see, and I know I would not have thought of this way of including them in assessment except for my work with National Board for Professional Standards. My journey with NBTS and Education Leadership Oklahoma changed the way I teach, the way I look at myself and my students, and has led to deeper student learning and achievement. The support I was given by my state Legislature was instrumental in these changes in my classroom, and instrumental in my students' learning and reflecting on their learning.

At the beginning of this semester, things looked grim. Seven students HATED reading, three hated it, and one couldn't commit between 'hate' and 'don't like.' One student was very vocal about the fact he HATED reading and didn't intend to change his mind, even though siblings and friends had told him I would change his mind.

I asked students to reflect on what they saw in the sticky-note chart, and we began our work. Students are engulfed in a reading environment, surrounded by books and by readers.

Any one day, we will experience all of the English Language Arts Strands: reading, writing, speaking, listening (producing), and viewing. Reading every day, writing reflections about reading, talking about books, listening to classmates talk about books. Producing and sharing multi-media book shares. We read and read.

I knew I had nothing to fear from those 'haters' because I knew most of them would find books they liked and they would change their opinions...even just a bit.

Nine weeks later I destroyed our 'presurvey' chart on the whiteboard and had everyone place a new sticky on the board. We saw dramatic changes. My new students were surprised; my returning students knew this would be the case...they understand the power of choosing your own books, and in finding that one book that changes your mind about reading.

It's not enough to have students create the chart...if NBC taught me anything, it taught me the power of reflection and authentic assessment. I have learned to include students as partners in assessment. So, I displayed the two charts and asked students to look carefully and comment on what they see. They never never never let me down.

Themes develop. Students consistently mention time and choice. They appreciate both -- because, let's face it, time to read and freedom to choose what to read are seldom part of a high school student's day. One student said it for everyone: "Once people start reading and find their perfect book, they get on this reading kick and gain confidence in reading." Confidence often plays out in higher test scores: "My ACT score for English alone went up after taking this class twice."

Another strong theme is learning about books and genres, and finding that one book...that first book...that 'home run' book, as Jim Trelease, calls it. My returning students talked about this phenomenon at the beginning of the book, perfectly confident our 'haters' would find 'that book.' And most have done just that. One student put it this way: "The difference is we have gotten to read. The more kids read fun books, the more enjoyable it makes reading. Analyzing books can ruin even the best books, so it makes sense...this class provides a break." Another, even stronger statement: "[We've] finally been allowed to read books that [we] actually like...Reading for Pleasure attempts to undo what we've been taught since elementary school: literature at school = boring."

This idea of finding a book that can make a difference builds on Peter Johnston's view of  a 'dynamic-performance' view of learning. I have many students enter my class,  utterly convinced they'll fail. They see themselves, not as capable, confident learners, but as 'bad readers.' They don't think anything can change this. They are fixed in their view of their own learning and reading. Other people are good readers; they aren't. Students who've taken R4P more than once deeply understand the truth. We need to be open to the search. We need to let books find us. And when they do find us, we become strong, confident readers. In nine weeks, nearly everyone has found that book, and has a new view of themselves as readers now.

My one hold-out is the young man who is waiting for this magic he's been told about. A classmate jokingly suggested strangulation for messing up our chart...but I know this student -- he is a skeptic, he's smart and funny. His attitude is positive and his intentions are pure. He is really trying to find some joy in reading. He's worked hard searching for a genre he likes. He understands his current position: "Differences [in the charts]? I am alone in hate...you have brainwashed everyone. You are taking over the world. 'I pledge allegiance to the flag of Mrs. Swisher.' Seriously, I'm like two positions away from anyone. Now what? I must resist. I know that everyone in class is coming after me. After that last battle, I lost a leg. C took it. as long as I'm quiet they might not notice. Oh, God. They heard me...." How can I NOT love a kid who can tell me a story like this? How can I not spend time helping him find his home run book?

National Board, both my own process of certification and renewal, as well as my ten years working with candidates, has challenged me to look for student impact in everything I do. Because I know how valuable reflection is for me as an educator, I have deliberately woven opportunities for my students to reflect on their own learning, and what happens in class.

I trust my students to be learners and readers. They never let me down. Policymakers and administrators may not see what's happening in my room, but WE know magic happens.

"We Legislate; You Pay Two-Step"

It seems there's a theme to the proposed legislation in the OK Legislature this year: mandate and make someone else pay the bills. I call this the "We Legislate; You Pay Two-Step." Dance merrily away from the messes they create, high-fiving along the way.

There are three pieces making their way though the House and Senate that will create sweeping changes, and give already-strapped districts the bill. My cynical self sees this as a way the Legislators can shrug and say, "Well, we gave them this and that...not our problem now." I disagree. I believe we need to lay complete responsibility at the doorstep of the lawmakers desperately trying to deny their own accountability. They want everyone else to bear the burden while they slap each other on the back.

HB1659 deals with National Board stipends and changes not only the amount of the stipends for National Board Certified teachers, lowering it from $5000 a year to $1000 a year, it also makes the payment part of a teacher's salary, thus transferring responsibility for the payments from the state to districts. I've written about this before -- it will make NBCTs less and less attractive as employees, and more and more expensive. The school districts never agreed to pay these stipends -- and in the current climate, they can't. But I see how attractive this is to lawmakers trying to find a way to fund their new teacher merit-pay scheme. Making districts responsible will instantly free $12 million-$15 million from the state budget. Win for them -- lose for districts.

Moving on, HB1062 'frees' school districts to allow teachers and administrators to carry guns on campus. I have linked to the latest version I could find. I've learned that versions change online and it's impossible to retrace the changes. It originally required 240 hours of training for an educator to carry a weapon, but that has been amended to 120 hours. The bill further requires any School Board that participates to pay for all training costs for educators...the cost of the actual training, any transportation and lodging costs. There are provisions that will free districts from any liability...I'm assuming for WHEN something goes very wrong and someone is hurt or killed. I can already hear them: "Well, we GAVE those teachers the right to carry guns. We can't be responsible for their mistakes." So, once again, the Legislature plans to make sweeping gestures of support for school safety, but to step away from any responsibility. How are districts who choose to participate going to bear the extra costs of training? Not their problem. They're too busy dancing away from accountability.

SB425 is the new voucher bill -- with a twist. As explained to us by Ryan Owens, of CCOSA, at the OKC Metro-area PLAC, it will allow students who graduate from high school early to take their per-pupil expenditure and pay college tuition. We were told the difficulty with this is the fact students are no longer generating this per-pupil payment, since they are not in a public school. So, schools will have less money generated for their per-pupil payments from the state. It sounds incredibly complicated...but is also sounds like public education money is being stolen from us to provide tuition to higher education institutions. The phrase from the bill that resonated with me: "The State Department of Education shall then reserve or retain from the total amount appropriated to the State Board of Education for State Aid purposes and any other revenues available for allocation for State Aid purposes the total cost for all scholarship payments." My question is: " Does this money come off the top of the State Aid, or is it taken from each individual district who has early graduates?" Either way, the answer seems to be public schools will see a loss of funds. More dancing...encourage early graduation, but don't support schools that produce these graduates. Punish them, instead. Add this to the punitive changes in the ACE scholarship program, and we see more tip-toeing away from our schools and our students.

Two-step: We make the rules and the laws; you pay and pay and pay. We give you less money; you pay and pay and pay. I wish our lawmakers were as serious about our students' safety and education as they pretended.