Yesterday I attended Interim Studies for the House Common
Education Committee.
Today, I visited with a mother who lost her daughter, my
former student.
Tomorrow, I will attend the funeral of that young woman I’ve
loved for nearly half of her short life.
How are these all connected? They are.
One of the Interim Studies by Representative Chad Caldwell, (R,
House District 40, Garfield County) looked at both the funding and the reforms
of a landmark bill, HB1017,
passed in 1990. The bill provided substantial raises for teachers, and required
access to early childhood programs. It also created a mechanism for school consolidation,
as well as requiring state standards for Oklahoma schools, reducing class sizes,
K-12, and added more testing for accountability.
This bill was a bipartisan effort, signed by Henry Bellmon,
R. Repeals were attempted, and failed. But the aftermath of HB1017 was a State
Question that now requires a vote of ¾ of the House and Senate to raise any
taxes. Since that time, our Legislature has repeatedly reduced taxes, but had
not, since this bill, raised taxes for schools until 2018's Session’s funding (and Walk-Out) drama that resulted in raises and a small increase in our per-pupil expenditure.
The first Study, hosted by member Caldwell, one of the few
non-educators on the Common Education Committee, purported to investigate the
reforms of 1017 – consolidation and class
sizes among other issues. In a far-ranging Study, speakers touched on the
reforms required by the bill. They talked about a provision of the bill that
never were fully implemented that dealt with incentive payment to teachers for
professional development and leadership.
We learned that the number of applications for emergency
certified teachers continues to grow every year. This year’s data is only
one month old, and right now, shows fewer applications than by the end of last
school year. Rep. Caldwell suggested that showed the recent teacher pay raise
was working, and that there will be fewer emergency certified teachers this
year. Other members pointed out that today’s State School Board meeting had
hundreds of requests for emergency teachers on the agenda. I have taught in two
states under emergency certification; but in both states, I had to have a
traditional teaching certificate. Since I couldn’t find a position in my
certificate area, I took other jobs, and had to secure an emergency certificate
in the meantime. In Oklahoma, though, emergency-certified teachers are required
to have a college degree, but not a degree in the area they will be teaching. Alternatively
certified teachers are required to have an undergraduate major that will
complement their teaching assignments…a history major teaching history, for
example.
Rep. Caldwell does not seem to be a fan of traditional
teacher programs. He inspired others to drag out calculators to add the current
number of emergencies to the number we had heard would be approved today by the
Oklahoma State School Board. The argument ended in a draw. But he berated
traditional teacher preparation with a story. He talked about a dinner he had
recently attended with “7 or 8 teachers.” He asked how many of them felt their teacher
preparation programs really prepared them to teach. He told us, with great solemnity,
that not one said their training prepared them.
Which brings me to today and tomorrow. No, teacher
preparation did not prepare me to hug a grieving mother, a stunned brother this
morning. No, teacher preparation did not train me to attend funerals for young
adult former students, gone too soon. You’re right, Rep. Caldwell. I wasn’t
prepared.
Neither did teacher preparation really get me ready for
being the sole responsibility, in 1967, of the health, welfare, and learning of
24 sixth-graders all day. Or how to learn from a principal who didn’t care about
anything but his own reputation. Or how to teach geography out of books that
highlighted countries that no longer existed the year I taught. Or how to
respond when one of my farm-reared students brought a pet white rat to class.
Or, later in the spring when someone else brought a snake in a Mason jar. On-the-job
learning went into high gear that year, and every year since.
NO academic training could adequately prepare me. And I knew
that. I knew the academics gave me the foundation. Academics gave me resources,
and the basics of what to do. I learned strategies to use. I learned that I was
expected that I would continue to learn and ask questions.
Does a doctor’s academic training adequately prepare them
for every patient they will meet in a career? Every emergency? Does an
architect’s academic training prepare them for every problem they will face in
a long career? Why is it only teacher preparation is questioned?
So, Representative Caldwell used this anecdote to dismiss
the necessity of a trained educator in each classroom…because he asked several
teachers if their academic training totally prepared them. This story served
his purpose.
Later in the same study, the focus shifted to class size,
one of the jewels of HB1017. Before deregulations by subsequent legislatures,
my high school classes were to be capped at 120 students a day. Not at all
unreasonable for five sections a day. Limits were even more strict at early
childhood and elementary levels. We were so proud of those limits. We saw them
as acknowledgement of the professionalism and effectiveness of educators. When
I retired in 2013, long after these deregulations had become the norm, I saw
160 students a day.
Representative Caldwell expressed his frustration with all
the anecdotal stories about how smaller class sizes are beneficial to learning,
and suggested that larger classes could lead to students learning more from each
other. He dismissed the ‘one study’ ‘everyone’ quotes to support smaller class
sizes, and waxed poetic about other studies that showed no benefits for smaller
classes. Made me think of Bill Gates’ suggestion
that ‘master teachers’ could teach huge classes because…they were masters.
So stories when they support his own opinions, and dismissal
of stories and demands for studies (and dismissal of research that conflicts
with his opinions) when that fits his point of view. The about-face was
frustrating to watch and not have an opportunity to comment. While Rep. Caldwell appeared curmudgeonly at his own Study, I was feeling decidedly grumpy sitting and listening.
I find Interim Studies informative. I learn what legislation might be coming, or
what legislation might face strong opposition. I can predict, based on
yesterday’s meeting, that Rep. Caldwell will fight any legislation that would
require traditional teacher training and halt our state’s reliance on emergency
certification. He will not be a fan of any incentivization of traditional
teacher preparation (the subject of a later Interim Study). I can predict he
will fight any legislation that would reinstate smaller class sizes. He wants
longer school days. He appears happy with out Reading Sufficiency Act, which requires
all third graders to read ‘at level’ to become fourth graders. All this
information is good to know.
Tomorrow I will attend the funeral of a former student and
hope I can comfort her mother and her brothers, never having been trained in my
traditional teacher preparation program to do that. Tomorrow my friends in
classrooms will hear stories of neglect and abuse. They will deal with behavior
stemming from adverse
childhood experiences and
trauma. They will find a way to connect Macbeth with their students’
lives. They will defuse violent outbursts by students who have no coping
strategies. They will sponsor co-curricular clubs and activities. They will
consult and collaborate. They will participate in meetings where they create
relevant curriculum. All these were never covered in modules of our traditional
teacher training. But that training taught us to be responsive, creative,
collaborative. That training gave us tools and resources and allies in our
work.
As frustrated as I was in that Study yesterday, I felt sorry
for Rep Caldwell, showing his disdain and antipathy for educators and our world.
He doesn’t get it. He could, if he opened himself to doing more than talk to
teachers at dinner. If he combined empirical research with observations and
insights. If he trusted educators as the professionals we are. If he spent a
day, a week, shadowing a teacher in his district. Did cafeteria and recess
duty, went with a teacher to a football game, attended an advisory meeting.
Came with me to the funeral I’m attending tomorrow.
He could learn a lot…by watching us learn, day-by-day, to do
this job. Always learning.
